#1
|
|||
|
|||
sorry!
if it was my comment that got the man candy thread closed, cos of the discussion with diplodocus about porn, having just read it back i agree it is not loungeworthy if it was that i'll happily delete it rather than have the whole thread closed.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
*stands in the corner*
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
i think its been locked cos i went to the trouble of putting up the synyster gates picture and got nil support!! which IS enough of a reason tbf.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
Quote:
gonna be trying to stay out of that debate though, i'm already getting irate in advance :P |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
Quote:
i feel encouraged by your tales of lusty women but dont forget there were women in thread talking about why they dont talk about this stuff, and how they felt about the male reactions to admittedly rare female displays of interest. anyway the mods have stepped in so i can no longer ruin the man-candy pic procession properly; i'll shut up :P |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
Quote:
yeah theres been women who have shown an interest, my whole thing was just that female "interest" seems to be pretty feckin mild compared with male interest and even if a woman gets with you i dont necessarily think guys get the same appreciation women do, but that truly needs to be considered on a case by case basis, i wouldnt generalise on that. not much love to be had for a fella, i'm afraid. luckily i myself have a lot of love to give :P |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sorry!
I had a dream about that thread. not about the man candy mind you,
But about debating with a woman about how a little bit of sneaky ogling is ok as long as I don't get creepy about it, but she called me a freak and a perve and hit me. |