#1
|
|||
|
|||
policy question
is there a specific policy regarding people posting topless pictures of themselves or is it more of a discretionary thing?
i had to chuckle as i mused that most dating sites wont allow it xD |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Seen, I'll get back to you ASAP
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
since i've never seen any women here posting topless pics of themselves.
[except becky once i think...?] I take it Seth, you object to the males displaying topless pics? well Seth, i can't say i'm a massive fan of it either lol........ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
just curious. like i say, i saw that they don't allow it on a bunch of dating sites and it just made me think "i wonder if sauk has a policy". if they don't hurry up i'm gonna have to put my t shirt back on : / |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
If they make it policy then this may spell the end to alot of posts in the man candy thread. you'll be popular then won't you Seth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
see i think thats different, i think its different posting "here i am with my top off" to posting "here's some random dude off the telly with his top off". anyway, why should i be held responsible, just for asking an innocent question? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
The rule of thumb is 'if you can walk down the high street like that' then it is ok.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
it's still sexually objectifying the male torso weather an SAUK guy posts a pic of himself or a woman posts a pic of some random dude. no? I don't see how it's much different. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
yeah i agree that guys posting themselves topless could be said to be whoring themselves, although there could be other reasons why they'd do it, too. but what i mean is, posting some random dude, all it is is a picture. with an actual user posting themselves there's this side to it where its "hi everyone, here i am and this is what i look like half naked, and now you can go see me talk about how lonely i am, how i don't have a partner, how i want one, and i can comment on your photograph and flirt with you and you'll already know what i look like in bed, whether you want to know that or not" so yeah i think there's differences between a random model picture and a user picture. but as i say i was only really curious |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
Quote:
I love the psychoanalysis going on here with this part not sure if i entirely agree with it, but then again you're probably not massively off mark Quote:
models are always attractive though arn't they. it's like 75% look at how attractive I am ..and 25% look at the clothes im suppose to be advertising. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
if tom hardy can get his tits out on here ...then so should cheryl cole what happened to equality lol |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
Quote:
i'm not saying thats why people do it, but its one reason for why they might. or it may start off as something else but end up as that |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
speaking of page 3, why can't SAUK be like The SUN ....,it is a family newspaper yet tits are allowed ...why not SAUK
in protest of male tits being allowed and female tits being disallowed I am posting this image: |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: policy question
why are boobs seen as sexual? everyone is suppose to be breastfed off of boobs, im sure most people didn't think of their mothers boobs as sexual .......so in theory we shouldn't think of others as sexual.
I guess it will remain a mystery. and I don't mind the women leaving in droves. If you're a woman of child bearing age and you won't post your tits ..then you might as well be male to me kidding. don't go all feminist on me anyone. |