SAUK Discussion Board

Go Back   SAUK Discussion Board > Board Management > The Garage
Join! Blogs FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 27th October 2012, 14:30
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default policy question

is there a specific policy regarding people posting topless pictures of themselves or is it more of a discretionary thing?

i had to chuckle as i mused that most dating sites wont allow it xD
  #2  
Old 27th October 2012, 16:39
Rane Rane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,370
Default Re: policy question

Seen, I'll get back to you ASAP
  #3  
Old 27th October 2012, 16:40
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

*waxes chest in anticipation*
  #4  
Old 27th October 2012, 16:47
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

since i've never seen any women here posting topless pics of themselves.

[except becky once i think...?]


I take it Seth, you object to the males displaying topless pics?
well Seth, i can't say i'm a massive fan of it either lol........
  #5  
Old 27th October 2012, 16:52
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiance
since i've never seen any women here posting topless pics of themselves.

[except becky once i think...?]


I take it Seth, you object to the males displaying topless pics?
well Seth, i can't say i'm a massive fan of it either lol........

just curious. like i say, i saw that they don't allow it on a bunch of dating sites and it just made me think "i wonder if sauk has a policy". if they don't hurry up i'm gonna have to put my t shirt back on : /
  #6  
Old 27th October 2012, 16:58
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by seth brundle
just curious. like i say, i saw that they don't allow it on a bunch of dating sites and it just made me think "i wonder if sauk has a policy". if they don't hurry up i'm gonna have to put my t shirt back on : /





If they make it policy then this may spell the end to alot of posts in the man candy thread.



you'll be popular then won't you Seth
  #7  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:10
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiance
If they make it policy then this may spell the end to alot of posts in the man candy thread.



you'll be popular then won't you Seth

see i think thats different, i think its different posting "here i am with my top off" to posting "here's some random dude off the telly with his top off".


anyway, why should i be held responsible, just for asking an innocent question?
  #8  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:18
Rane Rane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,370
Default Re: policy question

The rule of thumb is 'if you can walk down the high street like that' then it is ok.
  #9  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:20
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by seth brundle
see i think thats different, i think its different posting "here i am with my top off" to posting "here's some random dude off the telly with his top off".


it's still sexually objectifying the male torso weather an SAUK guy posts a pic of himself or a woman posts a pic of some random dude. no?

I don't see how it's much different.
  #10  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:22
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

so, er, no more topless blokes at least if the thermometer reads below, say, 5 degrees?


if blokes continue to post topless i must insist we see some ankle from the fillies
  #11  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:29
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiance
it's still sexually objectifying the male torso weather an SAUK guy posts a pic of himself or a woman posts a pic of some random dude. no?

I don't see how it's much different.

yeah i agree that guys posting themselves topless could be said to be whoring themselves, although there could be other reasons why they'd do it, too.

but what i mean is, posting some random dude, all it is is a picture. with an actual user posting themselves there's this side to it where its "hi everyone, here i am and this is what i look like half naked, and now you can go see me talk about how lonely i am, how i don't have a partner, how i want one, and i can comment on your photograph and flirt with you and you'll already know what i look like in bed, whether you want to know that or not"


so yeah i think there's differences between a random model picture and a user picture.


but as i say i was only really curious
  #12  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:30
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by surelynot
I see what you're up to, don't think I don't
lets be having them ankles, wench!
  #13  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:31
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by surelynot
I see what you're up to, don't think I don't







  #14  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:40
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by seth brundle
yeah i agree that guys posting themselves topless could be said to be whoring themselves, although there could be other reasons why they'd do it, too.
Quote:
"hi everyone, here i am and this is what i look like half naked, and now you can go see me talk about how lonely i am, how i don't have a partner, how i want one, and i can comment on your photograph and flirt with you and you'll already know what i look like in bed, whether you want to know that or not"

I love the psychoanalysis going on here with this part

not sure if i entirely agree with it, but then again you're probably not massively off mark




Quote:
so yeah i think there's differences between a random model picture and a user picture.


models are always attractive though arn't they. it's like 75% look at how attractive I am ..and 25% look at the clothes im suppose to be advertising.
  #15  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:44
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by surelynot
which the little scoundrel's angling for - probably sore he can't post Cheryl Cole with her tits out


You'll take my topless Tom Hardy pictures when you prise my cold, dead fingers from them!





if tom hardy can get his tits out on here ...then so should cheryl cole


what happened to equality lol
  #16  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:45
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiance
I love the psychoanalysis going on here with this part

not sure if i entirely agree with it, but then again you're probably not massively off mark

i'm not saying thats why people do it, but its one reason for why they might. or it may start off as something else but end up as that
  #17  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:46
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by surelynot
Physically, I'm as feminine as you are. You don't wanna see my ankles

i dont want to be titilated, i want equality! get them out! xD
  #18  
Old 27th October 2012, 17:54
Kevin Hodge Kevin Hodge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: lazy town
Posts: 24,957
Blog Entries: 51

Mood
Sneaky

Default Re: policy question

Quote:
Originally Posted by surelynot
Physically, I'm as feminine as you are. You don't wanna see my ankles

also - pics or gtfo

  #19  
Old 27th October 2012, 18:07
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

speaking of page 3, why can't SAUK be like The SUN ....,it is a family newspaper yet tits are allowed ...why not SAUK





in protest of male tits being allowed and female tits being disallowed I am posting this image:









  #20  
Old 27th October 2012, 18:26
Defiance Defiance is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,715
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: policy question

why are boobs seen as sexual? everyone is suppose to be breastfed off of boobs, im sure most people didn't think of their mothers boobs as sexual .......so in theory we shouldn't think of others as sexual.

I guess it will remain a mystery.


and I don't mind the women leaving in droves. If you're a woman of child bearing age and you won't post your tits ..then you might as well be male to me


































































kidding. don't go all feminist on me anyone.
  #21  
Old 27th October 2012, 18:33
Kitri Kitri is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,553
Blog Entries: 19
Default Re: policy question

Thread now closed since question has been answered.
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:21.


SAUK Award
Logo designed by abc
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.