#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question for long-term users of SAUK
I joined this site 10 years ago, but for the last two years I've hardly used it at all. Coming back, I'm amazed at how dead it seems. Have any other long-term users noticed this?? Are there less people on here? Given how much coverage mental illness now receives, I expected the site to be buzzing.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
I joined in wat, 2010/2011, it was a lot busier
I was around pretty much daily for a good 2-3 years? at least..then I disappeared for a while (no real reason, I wasn't exactly "fixed" just..didn't see the point of coming here) I can't remember when I resurfaced..last year? or was it 2016.. It's nowhere near as active for sure! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
I joined 2002/3 ish. It was very busy back then. I left in 2006? when I came back in 2013/14/15? it was much quieter tho not as quiet as it has been in the last couple of years. I guess people prefer f/b type platforms.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
^^^^
Glad you guys have noticed this too. I just can't understand it. In the last few years mental illness has become a hot topic, with virtually every celebrity queuing up to describe their depression, anxiety, etc. Given that, I'd expected this site to be really busy. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
It was dead when I joined, which is why I used the American SAS site instead, then at some point down the line, I just missed UK people and switched here, at that point it was even deader than when I joined. I think it's been going up and down since.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
...just looking in the basement, for example. Dead. I remember when it used to be crammed with people arguing about all sorts of this things. You'd put up a thread and it would be buried in no time. Have thousands of Brits secretly found a cure?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
It's good that the site is quiet as it means people are genuinely getting better,
So, the website is genuinely working and doing it's job, at least I actually prefer the site now as it was too easy to be overlooked in the past, Things were too busy and it was therefore quite often the case that many people's posts got lost or hidden I think, Unless you were a popular or controversial poster your views were more than likely to be buried under a sea of "hip and happening" or "controversial "posts, Sometimes it just felt like the same old issues you encounter in your own life,- (being ignored by the crowd because you weren't popular enough,) were being repeated here. It's odd that it should be a real positive that a mental health forum is quiet, But this fact is more often than not viewed negatively |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
I can't believe that people are suddenly getting better. SA and most other mental health problems are stubborn and difficult to overcome. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
It did seem a lot more casual going 10 years ago. Got away with a lot more back then. Now it seems moderators are tougher, maybe that's what puts people off.
Does seem strange to me some of the more popular posters suddenly not posting anymore. Then again I do post less, tired of seeing the same old threads and thinking does anyone actually read anyone's posts anymore. Back in the day the internet was fairly new , 20 years have gone by and I think forums have just lost interest. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
It does puzzle me. Facebook groups seem a lot less personal, but maybe some people prefer that. Are all the young people on twitter and Instagram? Or too busy swiping left and right on Tindr?
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
When I first joined in 2006 this place had a real buzz to it. Always a lot of different topics to read through which I could associate with and contribute. Much the same with the meets section where there always seemed to be something happening every weekend so I met a lot of people on here in person. I think it was 2014-15 I noticed everything was getting a lot quieter. I think the meets were killed off by the emergence of Meetup but its a bit of a mystery why things have gone quiet online specially as the forum sections have expanded over the years.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Maybe the help available for those suffering mental health issues is getting much better, so people are not resorting to searching the Internet for support so much.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
I only ever met one person off the forum, Nat36, but I do remember certain names, like Godfather, who all seem to have vanished. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Forums are kind of outdated. People tend to prefer Facebook groups and such like. Doesn't help that the forum interface is very ye olde internet. I like it, but that's due to familiarity and comfort. I can understand why it doesn't attract new users.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
^^^ He was around again a little while ago if I remember right.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
@Fungus & Moksha
I didn't say mental health was getting better, I said maybe support for it is getting better. @A Whimsical Stranger The site is already accessible through Tapatalk, which is a mobile app. I did start writing a mobile version for this site that accessed the data through the taptalk interface and output it in very minimal clean html, so it would be much easier on older devices and looked a lot more modern. I may finish this in January. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
I'm not a long term user, but I like the anonymity allowed on the forum. On Facebook, you have to use your real name. I find it off-putting.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
The whole forum needs a re-vamp in my opinion, it is dated. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
I'd agree there seems to be far less of a taboo in general society surrounding mental health than there was when I first joined 10+ years ago. Back then and as I'm sure for many of us discovering SAUK was the first time we'd put a name to what we were suffering, the first time we discovered there were other people with the same problems, it was a revelation, like "Oh my God I thought it was just me".
Nowadays perhaps Social Anxiety Disorder is more widely known and understood and maybe those suffering from it are more able to get support and understanding from family/friends/teachers and it just doesn't occur to them to look for online support. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
Quote:
Tink is right, if SAUK is to survive, it needs a major reform. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
I think also that declining attention spans and probably busier lives, and definitely what Vienna said about stricter moderation. Digital Spy (nothing to do with mental health) was always one of the UK's main/busiest forums and that's miles quieter these days. Their moderation is insane too. I use Instagram, one page for my nature photography and another to promote my online vintage business. It's refreshing to be able to 'talk' through photos at times, words can be tiring and lacking sometimes. And now once you hit 5,000 followers on Instagram (which is really no big deal) you can be an 'influencer' which earns passive income. So it makes sense people would channel their online time into something that can generate income. I found SAUK (and found out that my anxiety even had a name) in 2006, and mainly used the chatroom. Then my life changed direction and I've barely even glanced at this site for a decade. I remember when new topics would move off the first page within hours on this board, now the same threads are on the first page for weeks. I see there's some adorable and amazing people here, just like there used to be. Actually, that's what always used to depress me about this site - seeing good people so unhappy. I used to just think ''Oh God, why can't we all just grow a new brain and go to one big party and just have a ball''. I don't know who anyone is here now, or if the new people are old people, or new-new people. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Same here, Moksha, and Mr. Spaceman.
I was born in 1979, when I was at university it was the norm to have to go to internet cafes or the uni library to get online. Most people just didn't have broadband at home. I was 26 when I found about SA. I honestly thought I was just a defective weirdo before then, the only one in the world to feel the way I did. Life definitely would have got going for me sooner, and I would have missed out on less, had the internet been around sooner. Still, better late than never. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
I really don't think this is the reason for the low population though, if people want to access content they will muddle through no matter how bad the site is. Look at ebay, amazon, discord, excel, windows 10 etc. etc. Usability is a only small factor in popularity. Incidently I suggested to these guys to implement @mentions so we could get notified when people mention us rather than as so often happens completely miss it unless we search back through every post we have made every day and they were against it, so I'm not sure given that logic that an overhaul would actually be a positive change. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
I wonder how easy it is to find this site if you don't know it exists and are just trying to google random anxiety related phrases. If SAUK is only slightly less easy to discover than it used to be then that would have an effect. I don't know if that is the case but I think it should be monitored by those who are tasked with promoting the site. I presume that someone somewhere keeps an eye on this stuff. I would be interested to know.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
On a much, much more controversial note, I don't think the parts of the forum where the SAUK community chats off-topic, the Lounge and the Basement, are engaging readers as much as they used to.
I have 2 observations, both of which will be deeply unpopular. The Lounge is absolutely crammed with 'what are you doing' type threads which swamp and dilute everything else. I would get rid of most of them. I know that sounds horrifying, but the Lounge never used to be wall to wall 'what are you doing' threads. They have spread like cancer in the last last few years, making the Lounge increasingly ignorable. The Basement has become a one thread subform. The news and current affairs thread swallows up everything that deserves arguing about over lots of different threads and puts them into a sausage machine where any individual topic or discussion gets chopped off by something new after a day or so. I would encourage people to post new threads before posting on the news and current affairs thread so that there are lots of news related threads rather than one. That's my opinion. I don't expect to be agreed with, but that's ok. (Good heavens, a controversial opinion in the Lounge! This can't be happening. Mavis, quick, bring me the valium...) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for long-term users of SAUK
Quote:
I would have thought the link on the NHS page and the link on the SAUK homepage would be the most common ways to access this forum and both links are broken |